Using Classical Geometric Construction Techniques. Key Terms. For many geometry problems, a rough sketch of the situation is sufficient for solving the problem. Nevertheless, even rough drawings or sketches are sufficient in these cases. In other cases, however, we might want to draw a more accurate diagram with angles, for instance, that are correct in measure.

To be sure, computers can be a helpful tool in this regard; various software packages make it possible to construct accurate drawings for construction blueprints, for example. We can, however, construct some amazingly accurate drawings of certain figures using techniques of classical geometric construction, which uses simple and readily available tools to draw angles, line segments, and other geometric figures.

This article shows you how to perform a few of these constructions. Simple Geometric Drawing Tools. A compass can be used to draw a nearly perfect circle. The distance between the needle and the pencil is the radius.

parabolas can be constructed using the classic geometric tools of a compass and a straightedge

The needle is planted in the paper and serves as the pivot point and the center of the circle; simply rotate the compass using the pencil to draw the circle, as shown below. Basic Geometric Constructions.

We saw above how to construct a circle of a given radius using a compass simply use a ruler to appropriately position the arms of the compass at the proper distance. Another simple construction is a line segment joining two points. A straightedge such as a ruler is ideal for this simple construction, as shown below. Simply align the two points along the straightedge and draw the connecting line with a pencil or pen.

The angle bisector is "halfway" between the two angle segments, and it passes through the vertex of the angle. Thus, we need to find just one point along the angle bisector to allow us to construct the segment. Notice that if we draw a segment perpendicular to the bisector, we have created two congruent triangles by the ASA condition. On the basis of these and other simple constructions, more complicated constructions can be devised.

Although modern mathematics and most engineering and scientific fields do not rely on compasses and straightedges to perform geometric constructions, these are illustrative of some of the principles of geometry and how they can be applied using simple tools.

Practice Problem : Construct a line segment parallel to that shown below. Solution : Recall that when parallel lines are cut by a transversal, corresponding angles are congruent. Let's call the segment shown above l. If we draw a line segment perpendicular to l let's call it mthen we can draw yet another segment n perpendicular to m such that n and l are parallel, as shown below.

The new line segment n is parallel to the original line segment l. Course Catalog My Classes. To perform these constructions on paper, you need only three basic tools: a pencil, a straightedge a ruler is ideal and a compass. A compass is simply a V-shaped device with a needle on one arm and a pencil on the other. Arms of the V are connected such that the angle can be adjusted.

Below is a sketch of a compass. Some compasses include a rudimentary angle measurement scale near the vertex. A more accurate tool for measuring or constructing angles is a protractoran example of which is shown below. We will not use protractors much, but it is helpful to be recognize them. We thus have the ability to draw circles and arcs and line segments.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those involved in the field of teaching mathematics. It only takes a minute to sign up. Whenever teaching or discussing parabolas, conic sections and other curves with my students, I always feel dissatisfied with the standard "find vertex, pick points, connect the dots" method to draw a parabola. I feel like it is equivalent to guess-and-check, which definitely has it's uses, but I would really like to give them more of a complete and continuous way to create parabolas and any other curves.

One thing I was thinking was to have students to essentially perform the mathematics behind Bezier curves by marking control points, drawing in the scaffold, subdividing, etc until they arrived at a reasonable construction. I'm just not sure exactly how to go about doing this with regards to specific curves or if this would even be the best way. Does anyone have any experience, insight, or resources on constructing and sketching parabolas, conic sections, or other curves that is different from just picking points and connecting the dots?

I believe this is similar to BBS great answer but also includes constructions for the other three conics by folding paper. Has some pictures and clear instructions. Here is where things get interesting : I found this video and was astouned! Seriously, this compass is quite marvelous. Going to Mr. Sardeghi's website yeiled just a brief description and an email address.

So the address he lists on his website is Google Los Angeles but there is no record of him working there Linkedin and Google searches, not amazingly accurate i know However, the patent is registered in Germany. Sardeghi has machined out of metal in the video, albiet his has more frills. At the end of the patent it discusses the Prior Art and mentions the ellipsiograph, another wonderful tool that has much more documentation. Has a great demonstration using lights shown on a wall.

Depending on the angle the light forms any of the four conic sections, even including a hyperbola if the light is shown through a lamp with a cylindrical shade. Students could trace these on the white board as an introductory activity. Clear instructions can be found at mathopenref.

Instructions from the Autralian Assoc. Math Teachers here. I've got a construction technique for parabolas that's highly involved and requires a great deal of attention from the teacher, but it's really engaging and drives home some of the more obscure parts of the parabola, namely the directrix and focus.

Give each student a ruler, marker, and roughly square section of wax paper. Mark a point a couple inches from the bottom of the wax paper, this is your focus. Using the ruler, draw a line in between the close edge of the paper and the focus parallel to the bottom of the paper, this becomes your directrix.

Put away the markers, the rulers are helpful for making good creases when we fold, but not necessary. This is hard to describe so bear with me. The bulk of the paper including the focus remains on the table, pick up the part of the paper that has the directrix and fold so that the directrix passes through the focus.

Make a good crease and unfold. This first fold is parallel to the directrix and makes the line that is tangent to the vertix. Then, pick up the directrix again and make another fold slightly to the side, so that the new fold is just out of parallel.

Then repeat all the way up the side of the paper. Once that is done, make the fold just to the other side of parallel and repeat that process.

Subscribe to RSS

What you're doing is making all of the lines that are tangent to your parabola, and the effect of those lines on the wax paper will reveal the parabola.Compass-and-straightedge construction, also known as ruler-and-compass construction or classical construction, is the construction of lengths, angles, and other geometric figures using only an idealized ruler and compass.

The idealized ruler, known as a straightedge, is assumed to be infinite in length, and has no markings on it with only one edge. This is an unimportant restriction since, using a multi-step procedure, a distance can be transferred even with collapsing compass; see compass equivalence theorem.

It turns out to be the case that every point constructible using straightedge and compass may also be constructed using compass alone. The ancient Greek mathematicians first conceived compass-and-straightedge constructions, and a number of ancient problems in plane geometry impose this restriction. The ancient Greeks developed many constructions, but in some cases were unable to do so.

Gauss showed that some polygons are constructible but that most are not. Some of the most famous straightedge-and-compass problems were proven impossible by Pierre Wantzel inusing the mathematical theory of fields.

In spite of existing proofs of impossibility, some persist in trying to solve these problems. Many of these problems are easily solvable provided that other geometric transformations are allowed: for example, doubling the cube is possible using geometric constructions, but not possible using straightedge and compass alone. In terms of algebra, a length is constructible if and only if it represents a constructible number, and an angle is constructible if and only if its cosine is a constructible number.

A number is constructible if and only if it can be written using the four basic arithmetic operations and the extraction of square roots but of no higher-order roots. The compass can be opened arbitrarily wide, but unlike some real compasses it has no markings on it.

Circles can only be drawn starting from two given points: the centre and a point on the circle. The straightedge is infinitely long, but it has no markings on it and has only one straight edge, unlike ordinary rulers.

Common Core Algebra Work with Parabolas

It can only be used to draw a line segment between two points or to extend an existing segment. The modern compass generally does not collapse and several modern constructions use this feature.

Although the proposition is correct, its proofs have a long and checkered history. Each construction must be exact. Each construction must terminate. That is, it must have a finite number of steps, and not be the limit of ever closer approximations. Stated this way, compass and straightedge constructions appear to be a parlour game, rather than a serious practical problem; but the purpose of the restriction is to ensure that constructions can be proven to be exactly correct.

History The ancient Greek mathematicians first attempted compass-and-straightedge constructions, and they discovered how to construct sums, differences, products, ratios, and square roots of given lengths.

But they could not construct one third of a given angle except in particular cases, or a square with the same area as a given circle, or a regular polygon with other numbers of sides.

Hippocrates and Menaechmus showed that the area of the cube could be doubled by finding the intersections of hyperbolas and parabolas, but these cannot be constructed by compass and straightedge. No progress on the unsolved problems was made for two millennia, until in Gauss showed that a regular polygon with 17 sides could be constructed; five years later he showed the sufficient criterion for a regular polygon of n sides to be constructible.

In Pierre Wantzel published a proof of the impossibility of trisecting an arbitrary angle or of doubling the volume of a cube, based on the impossibility of constructing cube roots of lengths. The basic constructions All compass and straightedge constructions consist of repeated application of five basic constructions using the points, lines and circles that have already been constructed. These are:. Creating the line through two existing points Creating the circle through one point with centre another point Creating the point which is the intersection of two existing, non-parallel lines Creating the one or two points in the intersection of a line and a circle if they intersect Creating the one or two points in the intersection of two circles if they intersect.

For example, starting with just two distinct points, we can create a line or either of two circles in turn, using each point as centre and passing through the other point. If we draw both circles, two new points are created at their intersections.

Drawing lines between the two original points and one of these new points completes the construction of an equilateral triangle. Therefore, in any geometric problem we have an initial set of symbols points and linesan algorithm, and some results. From this perspective, geometry is equivalent to an axiomatic algebra, replacing its elements by symbols.

Probably Gauss first realized this, and used it to prove the impossibility of some constructions; only much later did Hilbert find a complete set of axioms for geometry. Much used compass-and-straightedge constructions The most-used compass-and-straightedge constructions include:. Constructing the perpendicular bisector from a segment Finding the midpoint of a segment. Drawing a perpendicular line from a point to a line.Geometry from the days of the ancient Greeks placed great emphasis on problems of constructing various geometric figures using only a compass the circle-drawing gadgetand a straightedge like a ruler, but without distance markings.

For the most part, early mathematicians were highly successful in this undertaking: Euclid's Elementsfor example, contains a vast collection of elementary constructions, including, for example, a way to bisect any angle, or construct a regular pentagon. A few problems in particular proved resistant to these constructive methods, perhaps most notoriously that of squaring the circle.

Nonetheless they occupy an important role in the history of mathematics: the first earliest hints of calculus appear in Archimedes' work on the closely related problem of approximatingand the proof of the impossibility of these constructions was among the earliest triumphs of new algebraic methods developed in the s.

The problems also enjoy an important role in the history of pseudomathematicswhere they have long served as a distraction for cranks. In the late s the bogus suggestions of means for squaring the circle were so numerous that both the French Academie des Sciences and English Royal Society were forced to pass resolutions declaring that they would cease to review any manuscripts suggesting solutions to these problems.

compass and straightedge construction of geometric mean

A few constructions remained that the Greeks were never able to give, and these remained mysteries until modern times. Three problems in particular attracted the most attention:. The problem of squaring the circle has a very, very long history. Approximate methods were known to the Babylonians, Egyptiansand early Indian mathematicians. The problem was the source of considerable consternation to the Greek geometers, many of whom struggled with it, perhaps most notably Anaxagoras and Hippocrates of Chios.

It became a famous enough question that it is mentioned in Aristophanes' The Birdsand the Greeks even found it necessary to coin a word for those who wasted time on the problem. The other two problems too were studied intensively by the Greeks, though they appear to have received comparatively little attention in later eras. The medieval Arabs too invested considerable effort in the quadrature of the circle: Al-Haytham announced that he had discovered a method, but later failed to produce it.

parabolas can be constructed using the classic geometric tools of a compass and a straightedge

Various medieval Italiansincluding Leonardo, also failed to make much progress. Even non-mathematicians weighed in, and Thomas Hobbes in his later years believed that he had found the solution. The first real insight into the problem came from James Gregory, one of the first mathematicians to come to terms with infinite sequences. He realized that the problem boiled down to understanding the algebraic properties of.

Straightedge and compass construction

Unfortunately the specifics of his argument were deeply flawed. In Lambert made a major advance by proving that was irrational, but this was not enough to rule out the possibility of circle-squaring: for example, is possible to construct it's the length of the diagonal of a unit squarebut it is irrational. Gauss soon announced that the doubling of the cube and trisection of an angle were impossible, though his proofs have never been located.

The impossibility of trisecting the angle and doubling the cube, the proofs of which rely on similar methods, were finally settled in by Pierre Wantzel, and Sturm soon improved on his methods. Even with great advances in algebra, the final nail in the coffin of the circle-squarers was not delivered until with Lindemann's proof that is transcendental.I have to choose whether there's a need for students to construct geometric figures themselves or use a drawing program.

Which one has more Pros than Cons? You don't have to list the Pros or Cons, I'm not asking you to do me homework, just lead me in the right direction please.

Argument A: There is a need for students to understand and be able to construct geometric figures using a compass and straightedge. Argument B: There is no need for students to use a compass and straightedge, and all geometric constructions should be done using a drawing program. You need to use compass and straight edge so you will pay more attention to the actual physical relationships between the parts and angles of the figures vs mostly learning the features of the drawing program.

You're not learning how to draw figures, you're learning angles and relationships. When you bisect a line with compass and straight edge, you're learning something about physical relationships. The drawing program probably has a "find the midpoint" function, which teaches you nothing about geometry. In my opinion, after more than 30 years of teaching math in high schools,I think that there is no need to use a computer program because they understand much better if they use their hands and simple instruments: Computer programs are too distracting.

The main goal is teaching to prove theorems and geometric construction is less important than hypothetic-deductive reasoning. Virtual School I see. If computers shut down you need to know how to use a compass and straightedge.

Drawing programs do the work for you, so you're not learning. It can also help if you want to pursue constructionsuch as drawing a blue print. Argument B Technology is the future and there will be a need for people to know how to use said technology to engineer structures in the future.

Support your answer please. Answer Save. Raffaele Lv 7. My students use compass and straightedge They have no computer in the classroom and there are practical hitches In my opinion, after more than 30 years of teaching math in high schools,I think that there is no need to use a computer program because they understand much better if they use their hands and simple instruments: Computer programs are too distracting A deeper motivation is the kind of work I do in my classrooms The main goal is teaching to prove theorems and geometric construction is less important than hypothetic-deductive reasoning.

PaulR2 Lv 7. Argument A Your computer won't build a building for you even though it has the design. Choose whichever one you feel you can support better. Still have questions? Get your answers by asking now.If we can't tunnel through the Earth, how do we know what's at its center? Is it better to use a compass and straightedge or computer to construct geometric figures?

What evidence does Coutu use to support her claim that improvisation requires resilience. A lady introduce her husband's name with saying by which can stop or move train what is that name. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site can not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with prior written permission of Multiply.

Hottest Questions. Previously Viewed. Unanswered Questions. Wiki User I think computer is better. Related Questions Asked in Geometry Why is there a need to use a straightedge and compass to construct geometric figures? The compass is used to measure angles.

The straightedge is used to draw a straight line. The two items together, are used to measure and draw angles and lines in geometric drawings. Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Geometry Geometric figure made with a straightedge and compass?

A construction. A contruction is a geometric drawing of a figure usually made by a compass and a straightedge. A straightedge and compass. Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Geometry Which tools are necessary to construct a angle bisector? A compass and a straightedge. Asked in Geometry Using a straight edge and compass make geometric figures? Asked in Geometry, Proofs Using straightedge and compass to make geometric figures? Some are possible, others are not. Asked in Geometry Why do kids need to know how to use a compass and straightedge?

To construct geometrical shapes. Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Geometry How do you construct a 10 degree angle with a compass? A 10 degree angle cannot be constructed using only a compass and straight edge.

Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Algebra, Geometry Were The ancient Greeks required a straightedge and protractor to construct a perpendicular bisector for a given line segment? Asked in Geometry What is the most direct use of a compass in geometric construction? The prime purpose of a compass is to construct circles. Compass and a Straightedge. Asked in Geometry What is a geometric figure created using only a compass and straightedge?

Perpendicular lines that meet at right angles is one example. Asked in Math and Arithmetic, Geometry What tools are used to construct congruent line segments? Asked in Geometry Is it possible to construct a cube of twice the volume of a giving cube only using a straightedge and compass? No, it is not and in Pierre Wantzel proved this to be the case.By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.

It only takes a minute to sign up. See the figure below:. Draw two perpendicular coordinate axes. The "somehow" is there because for classic constructibility, all points constructed have to be explicit. Here we will have to select at least one "random" point. With straightedge and compass, any required squares and products of these coordinates can be constructed.

Solving the system involves only arithmetical operations, which can be done by straightedge and compass. Now the ellipse can be put in standard form using arithmetical operations and square root. And as has been pointed out by rschwieb, once that has been done the foci can be constructed by straightedge and compass.

Remark: This settles the question of whether the job can, in principle, be done. There remains the task of doing it in a geometrically nice way. The above recipe for a construction gives no information about that. There does remain something interesting about the construction. It is one of many instances where a geometric problem is solved using coordinatization. Because the elementary theory of real-closed fields is decidable, most geometric problems of the classical kind can be answered, albeit clumsily, by a computer program.

Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered. A construction using straightedge and compass Ask Question.

parabolas can be constructed using the classic geometric tools of a compass and a straightedge

Asked 7 years, 3 months ago. Active 6 years, 11 months ago. Viewed 5k times.

Replies to “Parabolas can be constructed using the classic geometric tools of a compass and a straightedge”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *