Here we are comparing Denon AVR-XH to Marantz SR to reveal their common strengths and weaknesses as well as the differences between them which will help you in making a correct decision before the purchase. We have evaluated both receivers. Denon AVR-XH gets higher overall score in our ranking system which is based on the amplifier specifications, audio and video features, connectivity, multizone capabilities, radio and many other details. Amplifier score is based on power ratings, minimum impedance load, power supply, transformer type, total harmonic distortion, damping factor, signal to noise ratio and other small details.

Audio score depends on the number of channels, front wide channel support, maximum channel processing, support of audio formats, DAC specifications, room calibration algorithm Multizone score depends on the number of zones with their outputs. Radio score is evaluated form digital radio support and analog tuner with its frequency range, signal to noise ratio, harmonic distortion Denon AVR-XH has more power per channel, more zones, bigger power supply and higher signal to noise ratio.

It supports Auro3D. Since all receiver manufacturers have dropped front wide channel support and these models are no exceptions. The Current Feedback amplifier technology fits perfectly with the high requirements set for Super Audio software providing wide-bandwidth, high-speed reproduction.

The impedance at the Current Feedback point is limited resulting in a very low phase shift. Marantz receivers and amplifiers equipped with Current Feedback can keep the phase compensation via Negative FeedBack NFB to a minimum, resulting in high through-rate, excellent transient response and superb sonic transparency for the full bandwidth.

Unlike conventional Voltage Feedback amplification, the Current Feedback amplification makes the power amplifier in-sensitive to difficult loudspeaker loads. Marantz developed its own discrete circuit boards to replace standard IC's.

Those devices are doing exactly the same thing as the Op-Amps, but outperform the regular IC Op-amps dramatically in terms of the Slew Rate and reduced noise level, resulting in a much more dynamic, accurate and detailed sound. Over the years Marantz developed different types of the HDAM to improve quality and to fit to the special requirements of a product category like CD or amplifier.

They can be configured upto 7. Dolby Atmos is the first cinematic audio format in which sounds exist as individual entities, called audio objects. In Dolby Atmos, any sound - the helicopter, a car screeching around a corner, a melodic bird call - can exist as an independent audio object, free of channel restrictions. They can be precisely placed and moved anywhere in your room, including overhead, to flow above and around you in three-dimensional space.

Through the use of audio objects, overhead sound, and all the richness, clarity, and power of Dolby sound, Dolby Atmos turns your room into an amazing place for entertainment.Deals Amazon deals Bargain threads Classified adverts. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. What's new New posts Latest activity. Search forums. Log in.

JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter muntos Start date May 21, I need to change my current Marantz SR as I need additional 2 channels for 5. Based on my space needs I have to chose between the 2 above, which one would you recommend strictly for movies? For music I use a separate amplifier.

It should be standard, is a basic need in my opinion on neither SR or H. For film only I'd go with the Denon. Very good receiver. Just the Marantz set up is a breeze and Audyssey XT32 does a good job with the room. The display is not too invasive.

Marantz SR6014 vs. Denon AVR-X3600H

Hixs Distinguished Member. The display can be turned off in the menu.Forums New posts Search forums. E-Books E-Books Quicklinks. Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly Subscribe. Product Reviews Loudspeakers Quicklinks. Electronics Quicklinks. AV Accessory Quicklinks. Buying Guides Quicklinks. Join us on Facebook Here. What's new New posts Latest activity. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search….

New posts. Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Thread starter Sendu Start date Oct 12, Sendu Audioholic Intern. Does the Marantz definitely behave the same way, and if so, would it be preferred over the Denon for better internal amps?

Denon Vs Marantz...

Is there any cause for concern there? Would there be any audible difference using a Surround processor with fully balanced XLR outs instead? Sendu said:. SwedishChef Audioholic Intern. I've been reading a lot on these forums lately, as I've been making some changes to my equipment and setup.

It's been very helpful. And you, Peng, have written countless helpful replies to people, including me. Thank you. I can't back that impression up by citing specific posts or anything, but that was what my reading led me to guess. I was even more surprised you recommended the SR! I'd thought you'd said audible differences were very minimal across models in these price tiers.

Just goes to show I need to read carefully, and avoid leaping to conclusions. By the way, those prices on the SR are not available in the US right now, and I haven't heard much about the Interesting to know that might be coming soon on the Sorry I don't have info for you, Sendu. Best wishes for your upgrade. Grandzoltar Full Audioholic. PENG said:. At that price, why bother with the SR? Such low price may not be available in the US and other countries yet, but it may be a good indicator that the models will soon be ready for blow out sales in the US and other countries too.Forums New posts Search forums.

E-Books E-Books Quicklinks. Get our latest product reviews and AV stories emailed to you weekly Subscribe. Product Reviews Loudspeakers Quicklinks. Electronics Quicklinks. AV Accessory Quicklinks. Buying Guides Quicklinks. Join us on Facebook Here. What's new New posts Latest activity. Log in Register. Search titles only. Search Advanced search…. New posts.

Search forums. Log in. JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Marantz SR vs. AltecBX Audiophyte. Been researching the internet for the last few months to get into a home theater setup. In the meantime, I just got in the Atmos game by going with a Nakamichi shockwafe ultra 9.

The experience has been awesome but I feel like I should get dedicated ceiling speakers to experience what I think is missing in certain movies. I'm still in the planning stage but want to get the right receiver for the job.

Speakers, placements, sus, etc is coming later. Now, I want to make sure I get the right receiver to and these two look like the ones I may need. They are both 9. KEW Audioholic Overlord. I expect others will give you a more specific run down, but as a rule I assume you know that Marantz and Denon are owned by the same company and share much of their designs these two are much the same.

Marketing, Marantz is sold as a more upscale product relying on their more prominent reputation while Denon is more value oriented.Here we are comparing Marantz SR to Denon AVR-XH to reveal their common strengths and weaknesses as well as the differences between them which will help you in making a correct decision before the purchase.

Both receivers have 9 channel amplifiers with Marantz SR's being less powerful. We have evaluated both receivers. Denon AVR-XH gets higher overall score in our ranking system which is based on the amplifier specifications, audio and video features, connectivity, multizone capabilities, radio and many other details.

Amplifier score is based on power ratings, minimum impedance load, power supply, transformer type, total harmonic distortion, damping factor, signal to noise ratio and other small details. Audio score depends on the number of channels, front wide channel support, maximum channel processing, support of audio formats, DAC specifications, room calibration algorithm Multizone score depends on the number of zones with their outputs.

Radio score is evaluated form digital radio support and analog tuner with its frequency range, signal to noise ratio, harmonic distortion Denon AVR-XH has more power per channel, more zones, bigger power supply and higher signal to noise ratio.

It supports Auro3D. Since all receiver manufacturers have dropped front wide channel support and these models are no exceptions.

The Current Feedback amplifier technology fits perfectly with the high requirements set for Super Audio software providing wide-bandwidth, high-speed reproduction. The impedance at the Current Feedback point is limited resulting in a very low phase shift. Marantz receivers and amplifiers equipped with Current Feedback can keep the phase compensation via Negative FeedBack NFB to a minimum, resulting in high through-rate, excellent transient response and superb sonic transparency for the full bandwidth.

Unlike conventional Voltage Feedback amplification, the Current Feedback amplification makes the power amplifier in-sensitive to difficult loudspeaker loads. Marantz developed its own discrete circuit boards to replace standard IC's. Those devices are doing exactly the same thing as the Op-Amps, but outperform the regular IC Op-amps dramatically in terms of the Slew Rate and reduced noise level, resulting in a much more dynamic, accurate and detailed sound. Over the years Marantz developed different types of the HDAM to improve quality and to fit to the special requirements of a product category like CD or amplifier.

denon avr x4500h vs marantz sr6013

They can be configured upto 7. Dolby Atmos is the first cinematic audio format in which sounds exist as individual entities, called audio objects. In Dolby Atmos, any sound - the helicopter, a car screeching around a corner, a melodic bird call - can exist as an independent audio object, free of channel restrictions. They can be precisely placed and moved anywhere in your room, including overhead, to flow above and around you in three-dimensional space.

Through the use of audio objects, overhead sound, and all the richness, clarity, and power of Dolby sound, Dolby Atmos turns your room into an amazing place for entertainment. You'll feel like you're inside the action, in ways you've never experienced before.

Dolby Atmos for the home represents every sound in the original cinema mix as an audio object. The format supports up to simultaneous independent audio objects in a mix for rich, realistic, and breathtaking sound.

It recreates the director's original concept through descriptive metadata to provide customized playback for home theater and delivers sounds above you through overhead speakers, special upward-firing Dolby Atmos speakers, or a Dolby Atmos enabled sound bar.

If the content is not mixed in Dolby Atmos then the Dolby surround upmixer will expand the audio to all channels including ceiling speakers.

Instead of a fixed number of channels, DTS:X defines object locations from the listener in polar coordinates. It has standard 7. It has replaced the DTS Neo family with improved flexibility.

It consists of three layers of sound - surround, height and overhead ceiling. The base horizontal layer uses 5.Meaning I'll need a fresh receiver for the living room. This receiver will be powering my 7. Although, to be honest, I don't exactly know why because I've been extremely happy with the sound from my Best Buy Klipsch setup haha. But I have no complaints from movies either. Quite the opposite, it impresses me with every listen. Regardless this speaker upgrade will be next year most likely, but for now a receiver is needed to power what I have and potentially in the future.

The Denon has somewhat annoyed me so far as their power ratings are listed as that BS 4ohm one channel figure that is completely useless. But I mean surely this thing isn't outputting wpc on 9 damn channels, I mean right? Either way, they'll both be heaps more powerful than the Onkyo they're replacing and as far I can tell this Onkyo powers these speakers just fine, so power isn't too much of a concern. So what do you guys think as far as these two brands and how they synergize with Klipsch?

Thanks in advance. And if anyone can point me to a bench test of these two receivers I'd sure be grateful as I can't find one. Both Denon and Marantz are known to work well with Klipsch.

Rule of thumb is the Marantz is better for music, the Denon for movies but I think the Marantz does just fine with both. I don't know the difference between the two models.

I have the older brother Marantz It sounds fantastic with everything I've thrown at it. It's currently running in 5. The Marantz does not slow down the more speakers you throw at it. Here's a bench review of the Marantz You can find some Denon reviews there as well. Marantz is pretty honest about their power ratings. I just added an AC Infinity component cooler for the amp, to help it stay cool, though the amp never got all that hot, i just wanted the extra peace of mind.

Marantz and Denon are owned by the same parent company, so they should be reflecting their "specs" similarly, maybe you can find better details in a different area online. That honestly makes no sense to me. If something is "better" for music more clarity, wider soundstage, more dynamic, better sound then isn't it also better for movies?

It's also got a lot more mid-range than my old denon so music and records sound phenomenal on it. The sound seperation and presence in the surround channels is also much more present, but i'm also updating from a 10 year old receiver. I honestly don't know if the comparable denon line would be any different from this marantz i have, but i don't think you can go wrong with either.

Klipsch are pretty easy to run and efficient, so i think it comes down to budget and features for you. I've also really enjoyed the HEOS implementation never thought i'd even use thisbut in 5 minutes i was streaming Pandora to it and using their "enhancer" and the sound and ease to put that on while working fomr home some days has been really nice both denon and marantz will have that.

As I understand you enjoy music listening Tidalthen Marantz. But which? If you compare D it should go with M, not M Unless web interface and I don't know what else, I actually own a Sr, btw which is coming back from the past, there isn't so much new in the range Imax?

So Dts could surpass 11channel limit? Sr will cost you exactly what your budget is, maybe less. Edit: what has been told from other forum members is subscribed in full. Only a clear recommendation: I am still running my father's Klipsch Cornwall from ! Together with other 10 speakers.AVS Forum articles Contests.

Marantz SR6014 vs Denon AVR-X3600H

OR Remember. OldPM - Thread Starter. I currently have a Marantz NR that I'm looking to upgrade in the next month and pass on to family that could really use it.

denon avr x4500h vs marantz sr6013

This will only be my 3rd receiver purchase since when I started and I didn't know anything the first time just didn't have the money to upgrade it after that, and the NR was a black friday impulse buy that just worked out after the fact. I've seen some info that the is more like an SR but that Marantz has better quality pre-amp outputs on even the 6xxx series so I'm leaning towards staying with the since I plan to keep whichever I get for a long time this time around and if needed eventually add outboard amps so I don't want to shortchange myself on the pre-amp output quality.

That would be a ways off though too so I don't want to lose anything that might be more important in the receiver itself features etc. While I know the power difference is minimal, the Denon is also actually on sale right now and cheaper than the so that would be a nice bonus. I don't know about sound differences between the two receiver brands though. Thanks for any insight you guys might have. Remove Advertisements.

denon avr x4500h vs marantz sr6013

OldAM. Selden Ball. Originally Posted by flyinion. Selden Ball is offline. Originally Posted by Selden Ball.

denon avr x4500h vs marantz sr6013

I'm sorry, but my evaluation of their differences suggests that the reasons for choosing one over the other would be more emotional than technical. In general, the room equalization software Audyssey XT32 included in both models overwhelms the differences in quality of the preamps.

A couple of differences that you don't mention, possibly because they're irrelevant to you: the Denon unit has a "full function" front panel display while the Marantz has just a "porthole". The Marantz has a multichannel analog input which bypasses all digital processing.


Replies to “Denon avr x4500h vs marantz sr6013”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *